Sign in
The conversations we avoid
Bitesize

The conversations we avoid

Conflict styles and difficult conversations.

Level
Bitesize
Learning time
1 hour 15 minutes
Where
Leading through Change and Conflict
Price
£39

When you step up to a higher level, what you paid in the last 12 months for lower-level courses inside the bigger course comes off its price, in proportion to how much of each is inside it, whichever topic it's from. Courses at the same or a lower level don't give credit against each other. A Focus course or above always costs at least £15. Read the full terms

Go to the courseStart the free Taster

Certificate of Completion

About this course

Overview and Outcomes.

Overview

There is no one best way to meet conflict, so the skill lies in choosing. This module compares dual concern models from Blake and Mouton, Thomas and Kilmann, Rahim, and Pruitt and Kim, examines what style instruments can and cannot measure, and uses Berne's transactional analysis to look at the register of a response. Ofsted's response after the death of Ruth Perry shows institutional choices in hearing challenge. The hardest conversations are rarely about the facts. This module explores Stone, Patton and Heen's three conversations and their moves towards a learning conversation, the Crucial Conversations path to action and its limited evidence, Rosenberg's Nonviolent Communication and Kim Scott's Radical Candor. The statutory duty of candour in Wales shows a difficult conversation made into an organisational duty: say what happened, and stay in the room.

What you'll develop

In this Bitesize, you will develop the ability to:

  1. Compare the dual concern models and choose a conflict mode by weighing the stakes and the relationship.
  2. Assess the evidence on the Thomas-Kilmann and Rahim instruments and use their results appropriately.
  3. Identify crossed transactions using Berne's ego states and describe how an institution can choose to hear challenge.
  4. Describe the what happened, feelings and identity conversations and prepare for all three before a difficult conversation.
  5. Use the third story, intent and impact, contribution and the path to action to turn a battle of messages into a learning conversation.
What it covers

The Modules.

1 hour 15 minutes of learning.

  1. 12Conflict Styles and ChoicesThere is no one best way to meet conflict, so the skill lies in choosing. This module compares dual concern models from Blake and Mouton, Thomas and Kilmann, Rahim, and Pruitt and Kim, examines what style instruments can and cannot measure, and uses Berne's transactional analysis to look at the register of a response. Ofsted's response after the death of Ruth Perry shows institutional choices in hearing challenge.39 min
  2. 13Difficult ConversationsThe hardest conversations are rarely about the facts. This module explores Stone, Patton and Heen's three conversations and their moves towards a learning conversation, the Crucial Conversations path to action and its limited evidence, Rosenberg's Nonviolent Communication and Kim Scott's Radical Candor. The statutory duty of candour in Wales shows a difficult conversation made into an organisational duty: say what happened, and stay in the room.38 min
Where it fits

Keep going.

Part of the Leading through Change and Conflict topic, also sold whole as Through change, together.

How credit works

Also Inside