Sign in
What makes a team
Bitesize

What makes a team

Team development: Tuckman and team effectiveness.

Level
Bitesize
Learning time
2 hours
Where
Team Development
Price
£39

When you step up to a higher level, what you paid in the last 12 months for lower-level courses inside the bigger course comes off its price, in proportion to how much of each is inside it, whichever topic it's from. Courses at the same or a lower level don't give credit against each other. A Focus course or above always costs at least £15. Read the full terms

Go to the courseStart the free Taster

Certificate of Completion

About this course

Overview and Outcomes.

Overview

Not every group called a team is one, and the difference has real costs. This module sets out Katzenbach and Smith's distinction between working groups, pseudo teams and real teams, Richard Hackman's four features of a real team, and Michael West's three tests from the NHS staff survey. It closes with Google's Project Aristotle and its five dynamics, read for public service teams. Teams develop, but rarely as neatly as the models suggest. This module revisits Tuckman's forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning, then adds Connie Gersick's punctuated equilibrium and Susan Wheelan's integrated model. Using Hackman's account of airline crews and their first days together, it shows what familiarity is worth, and sets out what leaders can do at the launch, the early days, the midpoint and the close. Great teams are designed, not discovered. This module follows the evidence from Richard Hackman's three essentials and three enablers, the sixty, thirty, ten heuristic and Ivan Steiner's process losses, through the shift from input, process, output to the IMOI model, to Salas, Sims and Burke's Big Five of teamwork. Research on senior leadership teams shows why the conditions should be fixed before you coach.

What you'll develop

In this Bitesize, you will develop the ability to:

  1. Distinguish a working group, a pseudo team and a real team using Katzenbach and Smith's team performance curve.
  2. Assess your own team against Hackman's four features of a real team and West's three tests.
  3. Describe Tuckman's stages and Wheelan's integrated model, and identify where your team currently sits.
  4. Explain Gersick's punctuated equilibrium and plan a deliberate launch and midpoint review.
  5. Explain Hackman's three essentials and three enablers, and why design matters more than coaching.
What it covers

The Modules.

2 hours of learning.

  1. 01Foundations: What a Team Is, and Why It MattersNot every group called a team is one, and the difference has real costs. This module sets out Katzenbach and Smith's distinction between working groups, pseudo teams and real teams, Richard Hackman's four features of a real team, and Michael West's three tests from the NHS staff survey. It closes with Google's Project Aristotle and its five dynamics, read for public service teams.37 min
  2. 02How Teams Develop: Tuckman and BeyondTeams develop, but rarely as neatly as the models suggest. This module revisits Tuckman's forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning, then adds Connie Gersick's punctuated equilibrium and Susan Wheelan's integrated model. Using Hackman's account of airline crews and their first days together, it shows what familiarity is worth, and sets out what leaders can do at the launch, the early days, the midpoint and the close.38 min
  3. 03What Makes Teams Effective: Models and EvidenceGreat teams are designed, not discovered. This module follows the evidence from Richard Hackman's three essentials and three enablers, the sixty, thirty, ten heuristic and Ivan Steiner's process losses, through the shift from input, process, output to the IMOI model, to Salas, Sims and Burke's Big Five of teamwork. Research on senior leadership teams shows why the conditions should be fixed before you coach.38 min
Where it fits

Keep going.

Part of the Team Development topic, also sold whole as The team that works.

How credit works

Also Inside